Background

District Dashboard Metrics

Because of the need to closely monitor course performance, many school districts across the nation, including Chicago, Dallas and New York, have incorporated metrics on course performance and associated credit accumulation into their internal performance management dashboards. During focus groups conducted with over 2,600 educators throughout Texas, the Grades Below C Level metric was considered useful by 89 percent of those surveyed. By comparison, the Grades Below C Level metric when reported at the student level was considered useful by 92% of respondents.

Primary Metric

  • Class Grades Below C Level: percent of students with two or more course grades below C for the most recent grading period.

User Interface

Dashboard Example

Figure1 shows the Grades Below C Level metric as seen on the district dashboard.

Figure 1  TSDS Grades Below C Level Metric

Status Definition

The Status metric identifies the percentage of students with a specified number of grades below C (numeric grades less than 75 and letter grades as D or F) in the last reported grading period, as follows:

The Status indicator is determined by campus-specific thresholds (campus goals) which are set at the district level. The threshold value is configurable and default values for the metric is 30%.

Table 2 defines the Status indicators. The calculated percentage is displayed with the indicator.

Table 2 TSDS Metric Status Indicator for Grades Below C

Metric Status Indicator

 

Metric Name

Metric Status  Indicator
(a)

District Goal  (Delta)

Grades Below C

Red (Percentage) = if percentage of students with 2 course grades below C is greater than or equal to district goal

Green (Percentage) = if percentage of students with 2 course grades below C is less than district goal

District goal and the calculated percentage of students with 2 course grades below C

(a) The Value column displays the number of students with the specified number of grades below C out of the total number of students.

Trends

Currently the dashboards do not support trends for this district metric.  The UI supports trends, but the ETL packages have not been developed.

Trend Definition

Table 3 Trend Indicators for TSDS Course Grades Below C Level

Trend Indicators: Objective is to indicate Course Grades Below C Level

Up green

If the value for the current time frame is more than 5 percentage points higher than the prior time frame, then display a gray arrow trending upward.

Unchanged

If the value for the current time frame is less than or equal to 5 percentage points higher or less than or equal to 5 percentage points lower than the prior time frame, then display two gray arrows pointing outward indicating no direction.

Down red

If the value for the current time frame is more than 5 percentage points lower than the prior time frame, then display a gray arrow trending downward.

The trend does not show for the first occurrence of a time frame since data is not available.

Delta Definition

The Delta column reflects the absolute value of the difference between the campus percentage (Status column) and the district goal percentage (District Goal column).

Table 4 Delta Indicators for TSDS District Grades Below C

Delta Indicators: Objective is to indicate Repeated Courses

Metric Name

District Goal

Delta

Grades Below C

Set district goal

Red (Delta Percentage) = if the student grades below C percentage is more than the district goal

Black (Delta Percentage) = if the students grades below C percentage is less than the district goal

Periodicity

The data is most actionable when loaded at the end of each grading period after grades are posted. Grading periods vary by state and district. In Texas, grading periods are typically six or nine weeks.

Table 5 Recommended Load Characteristics for Grades Below C

Recommended Load Characteristics

Calendar

Throughout the school year

Frequency of data load

Once each grading period

Latency

6-9 weeks

Interchange schema

Interchange-StudentGrade.xsd

Tooltips

The standard tool tips for the metric definition, column headers, and help functions display for this metric.

  • Green metric status: OK
  • Red metric status: HIGH
  • 'More' indicates drill down views for this metric
  • is ‘No change from the prior period'
  • is ‘Getting worse from the prior period’
  • is 'Getting better from the prior period'

Business Rules

The Grades Below C Level metric identifies the percentage of students performing below a C for two or more courses, for the most recent grading period in the current academic year:

  • For letter grades, below C is defined as a D or F
  • For numeric grades, below C is defined as below a configurable threshold (default < 75)

The metric must have at least one completed grading period of information; the metric is blank until the first grading period is completed and grades are recorded.

The length of the grading period is configurable and is defined by the district—typically either 6 or 9 weeks.  The final grades are used once they are entered.

Data Assumptions

  • Course grades are numeric or letter-based.
  • District has set the value that drives the campus goals.

Computed Values

The cohort is the set of current students for whom grades have been loaded for the last reported grading period. The cohort includes students of all grades at all middle and high school campuses and excludes transfer students (late enrollment) for whom a grade is not available for the last reported grading period.

The metric value is the percentage of students that have two ore more course grades below C for the last grading period.

Table 6 defines how values on the district dashboard are calculated. The result of the calculation displays in the Status column on the dashboard.

Table 6 Computed Values for Grades Below C Level Metric

Metric

Calculation

Grades below C level

Number of students in cohort with two course grades below C for the latest reported grading period * 100 / Total students in cohort

Data Anomalies

Footnotes

An icon appears next to any metric where students have been excluded.  When the user hovers over the icon, count of students who have been excluded appear in a tooltip with the reason(s) for exclusion.  By clicking on the icon, the data administrator will link to the data administrator’s page for more detail.

Best practice is to exclude and footnote students based on the following criteria:

  • Missing data

Date of Refresh

Best practice is for the date of last data refresh to appear next the metric in the following format: (Through Third Grading Period).

Implementation Considerations

Late Enrollments or Missing Transcript Information

Students who transferred or enrolled late or students with incomplete data in their course transcript from the previous grading period are not included in the cohort.             

Numeric or Letter Grading System

Best practice is for the metric to support both numeric and letter grading systems.

Drill Downs

Drill Down Views

The dashboards include the option to see more detail that is associated with a metric. Table 7 lists the drill down views that are recommended for this metric.

Table 7 Grades Below C Level Drill Down Views

Campus List

List of campuses and whether or not they are meeting their goals for this metric for the specified period.

Back to top